Thanks for always speaking to me like I’m 6. Genuinely. πŸ«‚πŸ€—

β€œIt’s not about beating them. β€œ

Good answer, friend. That’s not how the argument was presented to me. When i did research others were basically saying that it was knots against core.”

β€œ It’s better to have two dev teams creating software. It decentralizes the network.

More the merrier should be the ethos. β€œ

Cool 😎 but they don’t yet have the #POW nor the time factor #Bitcoin currrently has. Right?

The arguments arise from the disingenuousness of their argument.

Fax πŸ“ 

β€œAs I see it, 3.0 is profiting from spam -or attempting to. Fine let them. It’s an open protocol. β€œ

Here we go. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

β€œMy gripe is only with the bullshit argument they put forward.

πŸ§‘πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ»β€

Okay big brain 🧠 how can we use your tradfi experience to take down wallstreet? I said what I said πŸ˜‚βœ¨πŸ˜Ž

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Its not about beating them.

-Knots doesn’t care about core.

-Core doesn’t like knots and it’s obvious when you see the ad hominem attacks.

It’s all good. Everything is fine.

The mere fact that Knots grew as quickly as it did shows a great immune response that Bitcoin is gonna be fine.

Leave it at that lets all sing Kumbaya

OK, but you have to call me queen if I have to call you, my Lord πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Dealio