The delivery of your message comes across as a shit-lib that spends all of your time on reddit. Telling people to stop operating in some way isn't a viable strategy, even if you make it egalitarian. The behavior isn't broken, something else is.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's fine, people can do whatever they want.

But if someone wants to circular rebalance on my nodes then going forward, it's going to be much more expensive for them.

If they want to do atomic swaps for practically free, I'll be ready.

A BTC maxi will do anything but accepting any design faults in this BTC - LN -Liquid mess of being hellbent on making BTC work whatever the cost is or whoever will bear the cost. As long as there're ways that %0.01 of userbase can dance through this, that's enough. Community and user base limit due to increasing burden of knowledge and complexity can only be worn as a badge of honor like this if you're proud of having no UX knowledge and reservations.