Still trying to figure out how Saylor obtaining a large % of total Bitcoin supply by taking advantage of the current rules and never moving them is “good” for Bitcoin 🤔
Discussion
He siad when he dies his keys die with him. kinda weird. Thats selfish as fuck but hey he free to do whatever right. 🤷🏽♀️
Any FIXED quantity of Hard Money will do the job https://mises.org/library/book/what-has-government-done-our-money
Any FIXED quantity of Hard Money will do the job https://mises.org/library/book/what-has-government-done-our-money
Whoever said we need to altruistically do what's good for Bitcoin? Do what's good for you and if the Bitcoin network is worth anything, it'll find a way to benefit from it.
“Good” or “bad” is irrelevant it is happening and sooner or later if it wasn’t Saylor it would be someone else. He was just the first to CEO to really exploit the market to him and his shareholders benefit. Bitcoin is open to anyone to use good or bad, that’s the censorship resistant part working as it’s supposed to.
Same as hodlers.
Ironically, inscriptions did more for Bitcoin adoption over the past 2 years than even the El Salvador legal tender a few years prior.
Yea I think of that too. Hodl is good in short term but med-long term if it doesn’t get reinvested and into something then what is the point?