Why do you equate criticism with a request for banning?
Discussion
"Ideally to be banned" means that if you were emperor of the universe you would not allow their existence, was not meant literally.
The whole point for me is to understand the nature of your criticism, and again I have a neutral stance towards these companies.
So basically:
- why are treasury companies on the whole bad for Bitcoin?
- are treasury companies bad in general or is it something about how they currently operate that is not desirable? (i.e. the nature of their reserves is opaque etc etc)