Subnostr

https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/11babb60f66f6e7acc527e2f48c48f9568ff91f46a341ca594c817bfbb356e6d.webp#m=image%2Fwebp&dim=1600x900&blurhash=i5SPU%3A-V_NPAyX%24*%7D%5B00%3Fv_NXma0%2C%40%24*E19%5ByDRjrrxuozS%23NGs%3AsARPW%3DIARPozNaX8t7xGRPt7.SNaIA%24PwdNaJm.8aK&x=11babb60f66f6e7acc527e2f48c48f9568ff91f46a341ca594c817bfbb356e6d

Most of your favorite health influencooors are still stuck on this one.

(and unfortunately may never capitulate since they've built so much of their brand upon the fallacy that some fructose is good, some fructose is bad)

On the molecular level (i.e. what your liver sees), fructose is fructose is fructose.

Not saying it'll kill you if you eat a few berries every once in a while, but to say it's healthy is false. Zero fructose is optimal.

Sugar addicts gonna cope.

BTC_P2P 2y ago

Maaaad cope out there. Saladino is reaching derangement levels with his cope and super complicated “theories” about why carbs and honey are actually beneficial. What a joke

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

WhyCarnivore.com 2y ago

💯💯💯

FiddleHodlHomestead 2y ago

Saladino was my intro to the whole concept of carnivore, and I appreciate that he keeps experimenting to find what works for him. I heard Sally Norton say the other day that based on her struggles with oxalates, her attempts at full carnivore just haven't worked, and I think Saladino is similar (probably for different reasons). Also a lot of his work seems genuinely backed by his hunter-gatherer research, in which honey features prominently.

I'm not defending his conclusions, but if more folks approached eating the way Paul Saladino does, we would live in a radically different world.