This centralizes the entire zap flow to be not much better than stacker news and similar. All payments go through one server

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Only for that community

so why don’t we make a zap attestation intermediary, or use preimage

how would that would work? preimages don’t help you validate a real payment…

you have an invoice committing to the zap via deschash, and a preimage to prove it was sent, completely trustless

well, what prevents me on a cashu mint from sending sats to my sock accounts and sending them back?

thats how zaps work already… the bolt11 could be fake so showing the preimage doesn’t mean anything, i thought you knew that.

I am just focusing on fixing zap validation, not zapwashing

then just validate it with the zap service npub? the receiving wallet publishes it so it’s trusted

if you cannot trust the receiver to not publish fake zaps, you cannot stop zapwashing.

and even then fake zaps can be filtered because they don’t come from real accounts

I think the point is with a token drawn on a mint at least you can be certain that x sats were drawn on y mint and locked to z pubkey. Which, while still game-able, is a level of certainty above what you can get with LN zaps.

i think i understand the misunderstanding? each community would hold the sats for the posts you make in that community. Similar to how stacker news works now. I don’t know how to validate post zaps otherwise.

nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s,

i really appreciate all you do for nostr, and freedom tech, and all of us.

thank you. 🙏

you must centralize locally if you want any sybil resistance. a federation is the least problematic centralization i guess