I think you misunderstand me, Mike. I'd have no problem accepting Bitcoin if I was running a business.
But I'm already a Bitcoiner, I don't need convincing on how accepting Bitcoin outweights the extra tax declaration burden/non-compliance penalty.
What I'm not so sure is that Joe from the bakery is willing to pay the price, in order to accept a money he doesn't already understand is better than the one he uses.
I think nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqtxwaehxw309anxjmr5v4ezumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tmwwp6kyvf4xdux6etcxse8sdrrdpjxvde4xa58qvm3xea8sct8094kkettxacxgemhw4mkgvphxsunvdryddukscfewvuryunew5ur7cnjdaskgcmpwd6r6arjw4jsqg9ap9w4v98lpp6wzm3jqqc4lw2hlg4e4w57vmye6adc8fpw3hzkzv9zawmu who literally owns several bakeries already understands that 😂
I do understand what you're saying and I appreciate you are saying things many would say, but in this respect, we are not the same and I don't think you understand what I am saying.
I have never had a single question about tax across all the businesses I have converted to Bitcoin.
That's not to say that the tax office would be sidetracked, but if the first thing you think about when trying to save a town from poverty is "What are the tax implications", then you have already failed.
Tax plays no part in saving a town from poverty, it is a background low preference admin function.
We do come from different backgrounds, and I have never been on the position to thinking about saving a town.
My humble experience with orage pilling has always come from people wanting to know if it was possible, and how it was done, to keep money away from the state's prying eyes.
