yeah, there's just too many things conglomerating around it for me, and i just basically believe that some fragment of our ancestors survived the last such cycle and gave us many clues how to survive this one, and very possibly they will also showt up to help out, in the non interfering way that defines their Way

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A big boat ostensibly worked last time. Might be the way to go.

yeah, i do need to do more research on this but the key is there will be, almost certainly, a geographic pole change triggered by an increase of absorbed energy overcoming crustal friction and the fact that we are coming into a 90 degree shift point, which spans about 100 years in total, and causes a massive burst of energy to feed into everything around us

and the best data at the moment suggests that the crustal magnetic fields are ready to align best between gulf of mexico and the western pacific, which puts the new equator zone between hawaii and the band through balkans, baltics and central africa

i'm pretty sure the flip axis was similar as the previous time, which is also why the majority of surviving artifacts from the previous cycle are found in the region around egypt and greece/turkey, ie, that is where the equator was 12000 years ago.

the other thing about the landmasses around that area is that is a majority of land, between africa and eastern europe/west asia, massive amount of land, the logical place where if the equator passed through where i'm saying, it would explain all of the evidence of past history concentrate there

because that's where the people were! just like now, most of the people live in the tropic band, 23 degrees either side of the current equator

the crust is pretty slow changing, so i think it's likely that in the phase shift it goes back, mostly, to the old alignment, and this region i speak of will become the new equator, and yes it includes hawaii

i think there is arguments definitely in favor of anchoring in hawaii, that are the opposite arguments why to pick thte vertical band crossing through balkans and baltics

Looking at a map, and... It checks out.

Mexico might be a good place for the high elevation. Hawaii might be a good place for the water - water is great for blocking radiation and for travel. Mexico offers both on the west coast.

Another thought - sometimes I think, if I was going to establish a capital of the world, I'd probably choose Istanbul. But Baghdad or Jerusalem would also make good picks. That area is right in the middle of all the land, but also on the coast. Now, if that whole section shifts to the equator zone, then there's another big reason to put the global capital there - it'll be in the zone where you could have a stable space elevator. Three modes of transportation converging on one city - that's where an empire rules from. But if the shift doesn't happen, then Singapore is destined to rule the planet.

well, my money is on Spit, Croatia, but i intend to see all around that region, and i'll do the african coast too

also, just sayin, if the pole lands about the middle of the carribean that's like it suddenly became finland

Oh did I get it reversed? I thought you were saying the Caribbean would be equatorial. Will Scandinavia become the new tropical paradise?

And Split is one of the places in Europe I want to see. Basically I want to see Italy and the balkans, and maybe go up to Poland, but western Europe is remarkably uninteresting to me

also, yeah, about the Yuga thing

around 24000 years is the orbital period of our solar system around the galaxy

every quarter of this cycle we come to a seasonal phase related to the alignment of the galactic center's magnetic field

every time we pass these 90 degree points, briefly the magnetic fields of everything around us get neutralised, and everything is in horrible chaos, the sun usually has a massive explosion or 10 in a short burst and in the incoming and outgoing period between that giant blast life is irradiated and in the period after, a lot of nasty rocks congeal out of the exploded material and then pummel everything, after the first insult of the destroyed magnetic field and the radiation

last period i think this was relatively mild, a lot of storms and earthquakes and floods and whatnot, enough to wash a lot of large animals into pits to be preserved in fine dusty dirt, the previous cycle has also got some records still existing also hinting further at the relatively mild situation that was the Noah event... well i'm still equivocal - i think noah was 12k years ago on a "big" cycle 180 point (opposition) and that the 6k was summarised in "building and collapse of the tower of babel.

this is a somewhat unconventional picture that i can't entirely justify except if you said "i pay you a week's wages to spend a week digging up material to back that up" and i bet i can find it, but i just got that vibe out of reading a lot of old stuff and a good thesis suggesting that Noah was actually the last "big" cycle and that the tower of babel, no matter how awful it actually was, and you can read about several accounts of it in apocrypha, but that was the 6000 years ago incident, the story with Lot - yeah, impactor, meteor impact...

reading especially Jasher and Jubilees i recommend for catching some more parts of the story that is the pretext to the rise of Abraham, i think you'll agree when you read other versions of that, that it's a pattern that matches the 6000 year point in terms of being a minor phase between the strong phases that cause your Great Flood and Evil Sun incidents, that actually wipe out over 90% of the everything population