A big boat ostensibly worked last time. Might be the way to go.
Discussion
yeah, i do need to do more research on this but the key is there will be, almost certainly, a geographic pole change triggered by an increase of absorbed energy overcoming crustal friction and the fact that we are coming into a 90 degree shift point, which spans about 100 years in total, and causes a massive burst of energy to feed into everything around us
and the best data at the moment suggests that the crustal magnetic fields are ready to align best between gulf of mexico and the western pacific, which puts the new equator zone between hawaii and the band through balkans, baltics and central africa
i'm pretty sure the flip axis was similar as the previous time, which is also why the majority of surviving artifacts from the previous cycle are found in the region around egypt and greece/turkey, ie, that is where the equator was 12000 years ago.
the other thing about the landmasses around that area is that is a majority of land, between africa and eastern europe/west asia, massive amount of land, the logical place where if the equator passed through where i'm saying, it would explain all of the evidence of past history concentrate there
because that's where the people were! just like now, most of the people live in the tropic band, 23 degrees either side of the current equator
the crust is pretty slow changing, so i think it's likely that in the phase shift it goes back, mostly, to the old alignment, and this region i speak of will become the new equator, and yes it includes hawaii
i think there is arguments definitely in favor of anchoring in hawaii, that are the opposite arguments why to pick thte vertical band crossing through balkans and baltics
Looking at a map, and... It checks out.
Mexico might be a good place for the high elevation. Hawaii might be a good place for the water - water is great for blocking radiation and for travel. Mexico offers both on the west coast.
Another thought - sometimes I think, if I was going to establish a capital of the world, I'd probably choose Istanbul. But Baghdad or Jerusalem would also make good picks. That area is right in the middle of all the land, but also on the coast. Now, if that whole section shifts to the equator zone, then there's another big reason to put the global capital there - it'll be in the zone where you could have a stable space elevator. Three modes of transportation converging on one city - that's where an empire rules from. But if the shift doesn't happen, then Singapore is destined to rule the planet.
well, my money is on Spit, Croatia, but i intend to see all around that region, and i'll do the african coast too
also, just sayin, if the pole lands about the middle of the carribean that's like it suddenly became finland
Oh did I get it reversed? I thought you were saying the Caribbean would be equatorial. Will Scandinavia become the new tropical paradise?
And Split is one of the places in Europe I want to see. Basically I want to see Italy and the balkans, and maybe go up to Poland, but western Europe is remarkably uninteresting to me