Replying to Avatar Skipper

Running #GrapheneOS on a Pixel 9 Pro Fold as my daily driver for EVERYTHING.

When i'm outside i use it as a phone (6.3-inch outer screen), when i'm at home i unfold the 8.0-inch inner screen, connect my bluetooth mouse and keyboard and use it like a desktop. When unfolded, it looks like a mini-tablet with square screen.

I do all my websurfing, #nostr stuff, media consumption, gaming, ebooks, secondbrain, torrents, through my phone. I'm also running my own LN node and #Nostr relay, using nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 and Citrine.

For internet, I use an eSIM with unlimited data plan, i never use WiFis. My phone has everything, and is always with me. All my apps are opensource, and the very few ones that aren't are kept in a seperate userprofile with very limited permissions.

GrapheneOS only operating system that i can trust. I rarely turn on my Linux laptop anymore, only when i need to do something that can't be done (yet) with Android.

Some of you might call me crazy, but I'm really happy with my current #minimalistic #cypherpunk setup.

That's the way G

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Does the esim have the baseband cell identifier?

I do not know. Never put an esim on mine.

cc nostr:npub1ytm3v8mkup6mnc9z2zjy0zz2czdsfd3kal7hcup6jgu5a5lm885qhup3z6

Folks, please (heavily) consider silent.link .

🔽🔽 Here's some info about why their particular esims are more secure than your average ISP controlled eSim:

https://silent.link/faq

The real issue is the phone number. That's the attack vector. Allowing inbound only remediates that issue entirely. But most people feel they can't live without a number. I'd argue the contrary.

Remember, privacy is a layered approach. Otherwise it's called "secrecy" and you don't want that, cause then you be one a target, like a government agency.