Gotta love Casey, true punk.

I’m sure ordinal bag holders will be for this.

Is there any warranty provided for ordinals owners?

😃

confidential, similar to XMR ring signatures? wouldn't something like that create bloat in itself?

BREAKING: ORDINALS CREATOR SPECULATES ON ITS DEMISE

👀👌

👀

Bitcoin will never get anything like that except through Drivechain.

Interesting thought, but I'd say such superposition already exists.

If there is no CT, there is still no mapping between sats in each input and sats in each output. (Because satoshis don't exist, any more than an inch 'exists'). Unambiguous mapping of input to output only exists for 1 in 1 out.

Any other interpretation like FIFO is just something an observer makes up. Not just that, but it clearly has zero correlation with actual chains of ownership.

It's true that CT makes this arbitrary assignation either impossible or much harder. You could still do it by publically sharing info (which is verifiable). It would be stupid, of course, because you could just choose to not use CT.

nostr:nevent1qqs8735gevauguff55zapujsn73rpjdkhzly9us9a7u4p0yyp6jwv0cpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygqyey2a4mlw8qchlfe5g39vacus4qnflevppv3yre0xm56rm7lveypsgqqqqqqs6hqqap

Btc should stay transparent by default so that the people can audit their public institutions. The people however should be able to make their transactions confidential.

Use liquid for confidential transactions

"banksy likes this"