What, are you playing bingo as a coping mechanism or something? Won't you please be more explicit about which of my implications and statements you are picking out?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsahhd4m nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdgqc52h68p7m2uar5yxmc2gp67rcjmlwm6yjr4xt3m4jg4k4rmdstz07am
3 untenable implications in the first paragraph
another false statement in the second
Discussion
funny that you keep asking questions instead of making direct assertions
let's take "shallow and worthless sex"
how do you know this?
I've done a lot of both I think. I try to make statements when I have something clear and concrete to say.
"Shallow and worthless sex" is not a complete, grammatically correct statement. You would need to add a verb and a subject before I would be able to say what I know and how. For example, I could tell you why I believe that "gay sex with boys is shallow and worthless sex", but I wouldn't be able to tell you why "shallow and worthless sex."
If that's what you were trying to ask, then I could answer it easily. I know that sex is shallow and worthless when it's between two males, because two males have nothing to offer eachother that the other doesn't already have without sex. I know that sex between an adult and a little boy is shallow and worthless because children are too incompetent and infertile for an adult parner and because adults are too ugly and unattractive for an underaged partner.
I hope these assertions are direct enough for you, I don't want to be passive aggressive when there is an opportunity to be actively critical towards you or your beliefs.
I would love to hear more questions from you. If you have any thing else you want to talk about, please try to make more complete sentences. It's easier to respond to what you have to say if you are more explicit about what exactly you are asking.