seems like that hot take wasn’t so hot after all. what should I start arguing in favour of that will really wind people up?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ordinals.

Ask Ye.

Tail emissions

if needed will happen spontaneously and form a schelling point with signal proportionate to the direness of the need. if not needed, irrelevant. in either case doesn’t need to be worried about for 50+ years and never needs to be planned for.

next.

😂😂

Jezus Rudy banned again. Someone should drag his ass to Nostr

Lol everyone basically agreed

It’s cause we all use WOS on here and it’s so much easier than wiring into my own node on the umbrel even though I have that too.

Banks

banks in the classical sense are very useful. in the modern sense they are awful and exploitative. not so interesting or original a take, I’m afraid.

This is actually an important point. It will help us make a case if we don’t vilify but instead acknowledge how this situation has organically arisen from what used to be a good idea.

maybe one interesting angle is that it used to be a necessary idea, but bitcoin removes that necessity, which is nice. what we get with bitcoin will arguably be an even purer form of what about it was initially good.

💯

But depending on the take it will wind people up. Here is an example: how can bitcoin ever replace credit and money creation? I am very winded up.

Try this: Bitcoin still worth around $20k in 2030

Rakia > Whiskey

yeah but that’s just true