No it's not. It's a cynical combination of whataboutism and ad hominem - neither of which are logically valid arguments.
Discussion
I prefer to think of it as a rolling cauldron of incoherent normative ethical claims.
No it's not. It's a cynical combination of whataboutism and ad hominem - neither of which are logically valid arguments.
I prefer to think of it as a rolling cauldron of incoherent normative ethical claims.