Why?

If (the constitution is ill defined)

Then amend it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

oh i see

you still trust the system to work for you .

good luck with that 👍

Ok then start your own revolution, good luck to you too sir. 😄

Bitcoin IS the revolution

Exactly my point.

No.

its really not.

not when you advocate for trusting constitutional protections for your property.

Bitcoin has to do it *without their protection* to be a revolution.

You’re projecting your personal views onto the analogy.

It’s a simple analogy of how change works in an “established” system. The original point stand. You’re just getting distracted with the analogy now.

Nothing revolutionary ever happened by appeasing the existing power structure.

apparently you don't understand what the word "revolution" means

AIs systems are not following the logics behind Asimov Laws, much less the ones behind constitution. The problem goes down deeper.