The issue, similar to the 13%er thing, is that this is basically saying you can be a bitcoiner and a shitcoiner at once (since a lot of people buy bitcoin and then shitcoins and end up bitcoin-only after more learning)
Discussion
If you mean held as in self-custody then I agree. I bought bitcoin in 2017 but consider myself class of 2020 because I didn’t know what I was buying back then.
This is how i see it. I would imagine most plebs from my “class” by tata’s definition of their very first stack, (2019 for me) have multiple whole coins, which i do not
If it’s my definition (becoming a price-agnostic-accumulating, bitcoin-only, node-running, cold storage maxi dark tetrad psychopath; late 2020 for me) then i would imagine they have about as much as me unless they weren’t poor at that point in their life, then probably also multiple whole coins
> If you mean held as in self-custody then I agree.
Yes, this is what I mean. Whenever you self-custodied BTC, and have since, that’s your class year, IMO. I believe this is roughly the “class” definition as it’s used in the vernacular.
If we wanted to roll shitcoins into the definition, I’d say one’s class is the last year they held zero BTC, OR bought a shitcoin, whichever is more recent. But here we’re moving from descriptive lexicography to prescriptive.
Can someone clarify what a 13% is?
Someone said 13% of “bitcoiners” hold shitcoins too, others say 100% of bitcoiners are bitcoin only