Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Saberhagen The Nameless

So, I always find several implied assumptions when it comes to scaling.

1) That everyone on the planet is going to be using crypto.

+won't be a black/gray market niche

2) That everyone on the planet will use a *single* crypto.

+won't be a range of different cryptos that provide differing utility

3) That it can't scale given a slow enough rate of adoption.

+consumer tech advances (Moore's law)

+protocol scalability improvement (Monero tx size shrinking by 80% since inception)

4) That decentralization is binary and not a spectrum.

+otherwise why not 0.1MB blocks instead of 4MB? It's unlikely and seems pretty convenient the 4MB blocksize just so happens to be the "cut off" point for being considered decentralized.

Avatar
kidwarp 2y ago

1. Agreed

2. Agreed

3. Agreed

4. The original 1mb hard cap was supposed to be removed so bitcoin could scale with adaption and as technology advances-

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.