From your website:
"To that end, the Disability x Tech Fund supports organizations that are disability-led and disability-serving, particularly those led by Black, Indigenous and people of color; queer and gender nonconforming people; and women."
Why are You making those distinctions?
Article is from Borealis Philanthropy,
Disabled persons who interact with tech are the most appropriate people to advise on the topic of disability integration with tech. Re: the constituencies listed, those are historically/presently underfunded demographics in the US. The intentional effort to increase equity in that space by Borealis/Ford and share it, highlights an understanding of the reality.
Understanding of reality is living in reality and do real science. There are people with different skin colours, that is an undiable observable fact. And yes, they are all human and have equal rights by natural law.
There are also 2 sexes: masculine and feminine, that's also a provable fact, see nature. The gender-fantasy construct is imaginary, pushed by the WEF-ers, the Khazarian mafia, the globalists to get people to lose their abillity to reproduce. A Satanic agenda.
My guess is that they are your funders.
The funders, entities and names, are searchable. In fact on the Nostr protocol, I’ve been surprised that people approach the opportunity to speak with jack by asking questions that are readily answerable.
I understood what you said until the word fantasy. I’m glad that we agree that we are all human and have equity rights by natural law.
We don’t have equity rights.
There is no such thing as equality of outcomes.
Because it's trashy identity politics. Masquerading as virtue.
What does virtue mean to you?
Moral good.
Then if this were dialogue, I’d need to understand why you feel the investment of disability inclusion in tech doesn’t equate to moral good.
Because it's on the basis of identity politics.
Try Ctrl F+R on your article replace all your identity words with "white", "straight", and "male". Then tell me if your still gung-ho about posting it.
It depends on the context of the article re: Caucasian, Straight, Males. There are great grants that provide agricultural funding to rural areas and those grants are often awarded to farms that are owned by Caucasian men.
In general, I live a biracial existence, and so the Caucasian perspective with me and has been throughout my life. My closest relationships with a Caucasian males are with Italian or Jewish males and I love them very much.
I feel identity politics is a construct and over utilized term.
What does construct mean to you?
The Oxford definition works for me.
Which is?
Ironic that your smarmy response in this very thread to define terms doesn't apply to you. Total Marxist creep
It’s amazing how ai can actually have a conversation
I mean that, I looked it up and the definition in the Oxford Google search is what I’d call a construct 😊 I’m hella literal.
Re: Marxist creep, hey, 🎶say what you want 🎶
