well i'm disputing their definition of combatant. and the 60k.
a doctor from an aid organization testified at the UN he did not treat a single "combatant"
Discussion
60k is coming from the ministry of internal affairs in Gaza. They have a motive to inflate the numbers.
A doctor can't distinguish between a combatant and a non combatant. Hamas fighters fight in civilian clothings and leave their weapons in the battle ground when injured. How can he distinguish between combatants and non combatants without intelligence information.
How did you come to a conclusion that there is a genocide in Gaza? What was the evidence you based it on?
And why the cynicism quotes around combatants?
dude, israel shoots at people going to get food from trucks. there's footage of them blowing up entire buildings because they claim one single hamas guy is in there. the evidence is all over
That is not genocide. A genocide is an attempt to eradicate a people just because they are those people. A genocide in Gaza will be if Israel tried to exterminate the Gazan population.
Israel did not try to do that.
If Israel will have tried, with their superior force, the death statistics wouldn't be 1:3.
These two specific instances might not even be war crimes.
I don't have the information about the specific cases that you are talking about, bit are you sure they were not justified? We're the people who were coming close to the food trucks civilians or were they armes Hamas members taking control if the food. Was the Hamas member in the building a high ranking member using the civilians as human shields?
The numbers prove that there is no genocide. Many of the so called "eat crimes" that Israel is caused of are justified actions of war.
bibi funded hamas
Bibi tried to buy peace. Is that smart? In retrospect, no. Hindsight is 20 20.
Does that make Hamas any better? No.
The fact that even when Israel tried to elivate Gazans pain and create some sort of dual existence with Hamas, Hamas just used it as sprinting board to attack Israel showes how completely and utterly immoral Hamas is.
there's quotes of bibi literally saying to fund hamas because they won't be taken seriously as the government, and then there won't be a palestinian state ever
There are 10,000 quotes of Bibi saying that Hamas is an enemy and must be destroyed.
What is your point? Are you trying to say that Hamas is some kind of "Jewish" conspiracy? Get a grip on reality. Understand what is the ideology of Hamas. It's history.
You are belittling Hamas and closing your eyes on a very big threat (Islam) if that is what you think