Replying to Avatar OpnState

The Adversarial Relationship.

I have drafted over 20 pieces of legislation. Legislation or laws are incredibly tricky to structure. A law will be scrutinized by tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of people. Every word, every definition, every provision will be analyzed and any gap will be found.

When a government does a law, it's usually because it wants to implement something. Say it wants to implement X. It will then spend one or two years carefully drafting a law that will implement X. This means having a policy advisor draft the policy, the policy will then be reviewed, the policy will then be translated into drafting instructions, which will then be acted on by a team of legislative drafters.

It's a lot of work, so the government must really want to implement X, right?

The thing is, members of the private sector typically don't want x, because x will incur a cost or some kind of effort in order to comply with. So members of the private sector will scrutinize and analyze every single word, every single meaning of the law, to see if there's a way of avoiding X. A good example of this is a new tax law or some kind of climate requirement.

The thing is, no definition can be airtight and no law can be so complete as to have no gaps. So gaps will be found and members of the private sector will take advantage of those gaps. It's just a fact of creating legislation.

What does this do? Well, this leads to a game of cat and mouse, or whack-a-mole, or trying to catch a slippery fish in water. Between the government who wants to implement X and the private sector who wants to avoid X.

This then leads to an adversarial relationship between the government and the private sector. Every single suggestion that the private sector sends our way, we look at it with doubt and skepticism. Civil servants, especially those doing policy, are trained over the years to see the private sector as a tricky, conniving Law avoiding entity.

There's a lot more to this discussion, of course, because this adversarial relationship impacts every relation and interaction between the private sector and government. More on this tomorrow.

Can you advise how you see capture of the 'state' by corperations?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Corporations lobby governments to put in place regulations which prevent true free markets and solidify their gains.

If you're talking specifically about corporations here, then corporations only care about profit and securing future profits So they find a way to ring fence their business by government regulation.

Yes, I think I asked too vaguely. Perhaps I should have said "how much of the legislation is really via lobby, and how does that fit in with viewing private sector with suspicion?"

Or, is it too hard for you to tell what the instigation of each new legislation was?

I'm sure the lobby infrastructure, especially in the US, has a huge role in the creation of legislation. Thing is, I'm not in the US. And in my country, global standard setting bodies have a much greater impact on what my country passes. So if you're talking about the US, I'd say yes. I would guess that the different lobbies, especially the lobbies in financial services And the industrial military complex are very, very powerful.

But at the end of the day, that's just in the US. Other jurisdictions are fighting a fight with global standards setting bodies. And that's who is really impacting them.