China has been deploying humanoid robots to its border with Vietnam [1]. This is just the beginning; expect this trend to proliferate to other countries over time and for the robots to become much more capable.

This raises a lot of obvious concerns but one that jumps out to me is the removal of the general public from its own security. Security is being outsourced away from the group who ostensibly wants to be secured and at the sole discretion of a class of people codified into law as “above everyone else” (ie. the State).

This is happening within the broader context of general automation where factories are being automated top to bottom in more and more industries. The general public has less influence in society at an unprecedented scale.

In AI circles there’s always been the concept of the “alignment problem” where researchers are worried about advanced AI being aligned with humans but until we can figure out alignment between groups of us there’s no real “extra” threat posed by advanced AI for the vast majority of people.

1. https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3334081/ubtech-wins-us37-million-deal-deploy-humanoid-robots-china-vietnam-border-crossings

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

According to beginning of the walled article you reference, they have not already deployed.

Why lie in your first sentence?

Why accuse me of lying?

It depends on which source you look at online; some are saying it’s already being rolled out and others say it’s in the process.

And in any case does it matter if it happens next week or happened last week? The contracts are signed and the robots are real and there’s clearly motivation to deploy these things. It’s not “years from now” from what the reports are saying. Whether those publishers are lying is a different story.

Because if they haven't actually deployed them yet, then they haven't been deploying them.

If there are sources that say otherwise, please provide them.

Otherwise, your sentence is still a false statement; a lie.

Here’s one example: https://tribuneonlineng.com/china-rolls-out-humanoid-robots-at-busy-vietnam-border-crossing/

“Deployment is expected to begin this December” and since we’re at the end of December and I’m not a world renowned journalist I figured it’s acceptable to say they’ve been rolling them out.

Without physically going there ourselves we’ll just have to rely on the sparse reporting and vague timelines but in any case it’s a very real issue that is being publicized by the company and government involved and I’m not sure why you’re being so pedantic.

Yet, no confirmation. Got it.