GM, Frens,
After some experimentation with Meshtastic on various LoRa devices, this presentation is what got me excited about Reticulum. I was aware of it before, but had mentally pigeonholed Reticulum as "like Meshtastic, but more complicated."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BN2eqcbuMA
However, if I understand this video accurately, Reticulum will virally restructure the internet from the ground up, giving users complete privacy, and transforming it into what the net ought to have been from day one...
💜🧡❤️💖💞❤️🔥🥰🚀🎉
How cool is that?🤔🧐🥰
I played with Nomad Network about a year ago.
I have a spare router to play with, even if I don't know what to do with it. 🤣
nostr:nprofile1qqswc7d4dz775c72vzgltwztp33ecy9qjx0pwhaqnfx7x920s2gx7fgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skueqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsulacej has done laser cutting.
Increasing food sovereignty!
After mega-corps took over studios in the mid 90's, they've mostly aimed their material at 15 year old males; the largest demographic of movie-goers at the time.
They'll only arrest people with assets. If they have to spend thousands of dollars prosecuting and jailing you, they want their costs covered by your property forfeiture.
For example, the DEA of the 1990's wouldn't bother busting cannabis operations with less than 300 plants. The cost doesn't justify the return.
This means if you rent, and don't have some large, non-secret, holdings, you won't be on their radar.
It's rare in movies prior to 2010ish. It's been accepted, and has become more common as a result.
I can't look past plot holes. Bad writing ruins storytelling. In most cases (nearly all), I can come up with a viable fill within seconds. Lazy writers should find a new profession.
We can do it. Some already are. Why are you still paying?
nostr:nprofile1qqsv3l02vh2ravmpz4um2d8z44l7k66d6szmv45czmhlzckhxye2zgspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skueqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsk6ax5a what are your bags of earth made of?
When the nearest LE is a half hour away, the large explosions will continue. 🤣
There are some that have this goal. Join in, please!
May your new year blossom with your creations!
May your goals come closer, if not surpassed, and may you enjoy lots of love and laughter with loved ones!
Happy 2026*
* If you go by "Greg's Calendar" 😜
Do the corporate regulations for the county mention a penalty for not following that requirement (or a blanket penalty for not following requirements in general)?
Before we can think of an actual "artificial intelligence", we have to be able to define what "intelligence" is.
I think we're pretty far from that currently.
Today's movies are so bad, even criminals are resorting to old stories for success!
I tried growing some once, but they didn't transplant well, or maybe I had too rich soil. Such beautiful leaves though!
That's quite different than LSD, but I think it would work! Just don't do it in concentrated form.
The police said it was done very professionally, and likened it to what we see in Hollywood films. 🤷🏻♂️
I assumed they were disabled, but it's possible they didn't exist.
I think you have already written code in the future. 😀 What a great write-up of your year! Thank you!
Because if they haven't actually deployed them yet, then they haven't been deploying them.
If there are sources that say otherwise, please provide them.
Otherwise, your sentence is still a false statement; a lie.
"Executives Have Painful Lesson In The Obvious" is my title for this. 😜 It had me laughing several times.
OMG it seems that he is being punished by larger forces, that now require him to use rotting fish as currency. I'm curious if his presence changes that.
I wonder if this will get burried, or rolled out.
You could be pre-occupied with making your own healthy chips for your family instead.
According to beginning of the walled article you reference, they have not already deployed.
Why lie in your first sentence?
Buying land, instead of real estate, would be nice.
I'm thinking of ways to be up-front about the fact that my friendliness doesn't mean I'm a push-over.
Too many times, recently, have people assumed that (because I'm generally easy-going), that it also means I'm willing to be ripped off, or gullible, or something. As a result, I turn into their worst nightmare.
I'm thinking that the next client that compliments me on my behavior will get a response like, "Just don't mistake that for someone isn't willing to employ a 'scortched earth' policy.", and possibly an explanation of how I do not enjoy teaching people a lesson in what I'm capable of.
Making a new garden.
That would assume a narrow reason for purchasing gold. The fact that it didn't fall (along with fiat) can mean that it is also a win. It really depends on your goals. Gold has often been seen as a hedge.
If your goal is to just make as much fiat as possible, then you can ultimately point to the best performer, and claim it is the only good option; but that's not how successful investing has worked in the past. The successful investors have always used multiple assests to maintain, or increase, their position.
Yes, everyone's phones are spying on all of us.
Converting your phone to a privacy-based one is helping the herd move in the right direction. Don't underestimate it! I think the biggest benefit is showing it off.
I agree with what this man is trying to do and more people should be aware of the subject he's talking about.
In the following, I won't be trying to argue against him, I'll just give some corrections so when you use him as a source to build an argument, you'll hopefully repeat the correct stuff and leave out the incorrect stuff.
Napoleon I. died in 1821, so margarine had nothing to do with him, but it was indeed invented in 1869 in France, was made from beef tallow and was meant to last longer than butter.
It became complete and utter poison when made with vegetable oils in the early 20th century
https://ourheritageofhealth.com/the-history-of-margarine-and-why-butter-is-better/
Also, "one molecule" of difference does not confer any information, you'd have to either say "one atom" or "one so-and-so-group", like one hydroxide group. His example of ethanol and methanol, while correct, invalidates his own argument there, because the difference of one carbon and two hydrogen atoms means a good time with one and terrible health consequences with the other.
I have heard about the test of leaving butter and margarine sitting outside for a while and I would really like to test that some day.
That's why all land is surrounded by water. 😉