yes to liquid. but im sure the other 20k users of nostr dont agree. but fk the whole lot.

unpopular opinion: if NFTs die so does bitcoin and nostr as nostr is reliant on memes and zapathons... connect the dots fam

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I highly disagree. But no worries fren

I also disagree. Bitcoin dgaf about NFTs

i know, its called FUD

bitcoin is fking software. nothing without users. and u users drive people away.

I am not understanding your point. Users will come because there is a need for decentralized hard internet money. If jpeg speculators are driven away in the meantime, that does not matter at all

so my thought is adoption is vital. but how do new comers come thinking they have a chance in the space? saylor buying thousands of bitcoins monthly among others by being close to the printer and you buy a thousandth of a bitcoin going to the fiat mine. as an african american my folks was slaves prior to inflation i refuse to accept future promises. anything like slavery makes me want to kill. damn udi and the ordinal people they are a distractions to the issue. ive noticed the west wants to fix money but not the cantillionaire effect which is a hypocracy...

Who cares about Saylor. Can’t control what others do. Just stack what you can

true fk saylor. however if he controls the market then its fuck bitcoin. remember when that smug fuck musk sold all his bitcoin? isnt that why we are at half the maket value?

Nah that’s FTX

that lil fat bastard got money from who? ftx is another madoff. i hope he roots in prison.

Shitcoiners trying to steal your wealth. I agree fuck sbf

fair exchange is not robbery

Fair exchange ? They took customer funds to gamble, lost it all. Then created a ponzi

dorsey did fair exchange for like 2 mill... call him a scammer

I don’t get the comparison between Jack and SBF 🤷🏾

someone else brought up sbf. i said dorsey sold a nft on ethereum for 3 mill and donated it. is dorsey a scammer or did he demonstrate the purpose of the NFTs as a tech. he did a good work with NFTs but im arguing with people that have never done anything in comparison. trying to tell me i didnt see what i saw.

this is the rhetoric im talking about. did the poor smuck who bought Dorsey's shitcoin nft think the same. is dorsey a scammer? did he not donate the money to a fund to support african youth to learn bitcoin?

sometimes arguing with bitcoiners is like arguing with women. im arguing your emotion and shit your girlfriends say. please spare me bro

Fascinating

isnt it 😁

I believe he donated the proceeds from that consensual transaction to open source Bitcoin devs

i posted the article bruh. dont guess, google the shit.

You are just here to be a dick now, calm down ser

The discussion started because you claimed bitcoin would die without NFTs and that is still ridiculous. Have a good day

haha. ayo gfy

mf love when you on script. the minute you say something from your own mind they want you gone.

No, you are literally just arguing for the sake of arguing now. Chill

Your article says he donated the proceeds to the Give Directly Africa Fund. They also paid in ETH so that’s on them 😂

im niave... i want to see good in dorsey. dont tell me donated ethereum 🤣🤣🤣

He converted it to bitcoin first

ok, thats what i remember. hes good money for that 🤙 pv

PV 🤙

Did you read the article?

💡

brother i was in the mix when it happened. its years ago now.

last i checked he donated bitcoin to start a foundation there. its to start a hub of sorts. him and the jigga man

3 mil vs 470mil FTX stole. It’s not the same ballpark. Not even the same game

if u were talking to dorsey you'd make yourself understand. 🤣🤣🤣

3mil donated by jack vs 470mil stolen from customers by SBF & friends. How is that remotely the same ?

whenever you feeling and girlfriends pay your bills i'll consider their opinion

His customers 😂 they deposited Bitcoin and he sold it straight away every time

You can’t buy a new car?

Choose Life, asshole

😉

I feel you but a thousandth of a bitcoin? Sounds like unit bias. A sat is a sat is a sat. People will just have to figure that out and act accordingly

Yes adoption is vital. But actual bitcoin adoption doesn’t come from appeasing shitcoiners and jpeggers, which is a very small group in the grand scheme. It comes from being objectively superior money and proving itself over time, and finding new blocks every ~10 minutes

yes, im with you. ordinals are trash. NFTs are freedom tech.

Bitcoin adoption is at an all time high though 🤷🏾

but the price dont reflect so find a new metric to make your point

You said “and u users drive people away”. So I mention adoption. Now you talk about price. Im confused

so i mean such a conserative position is not welcoming. stack sats and stay humble on makes sense to seasoned bitcoiners. as a new person we want to see what this tech can do and moving bitcoin to cold storage is lame af seeing as the space is truly light years beyond that.

Money that can’t be confiscated. That you can use freely. That’s not lame to me

Also layer two with lightning. Zaps on nostr, etc…

that is amazing and im grateful for such. we must consider how the bitcoin is distributed. peeps buy bitcoin with fiat. some have access to the printer, others jave to go to work. if we dont work this equation we are lost.

Seems like what you’re describing is the problem of money printing

Bitcoin didn’t create that problem.

I always thought of bitcoin as a solution to that

That’s why we call them “cheap sats”

Your correct in a sense.

brother im not sure who you came to validate. i dont need it and neither do they. if you agree with either position, put it out there. lets debate, rant etc 🙂

1. Been put that out there

2. I'm not mediating shit.

Just saying this should be a debate.

With facts!