Ok, now I understand at least one issue with filteroors. They don't understand that this problem is dynamic.

They think like statists do. I don't want X, so I ban X.

That's not how the world works. You have to ask a different questions - I don't want X, if I ban X, what would people that were doing X do next? And if it is worse than X, the rational thing is - don't ban X, I don't want them to do the worse thing!

I don't want spam, but since it is in principle not possible to ban it in a permissionless financial network, since spam can always be embedded in the transactions, we want the spam in the least disturbing way. I.e. op_return.

Not understanding this is low IQ thinking.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What the low IQ crowd like you fails to understand is that you are not an island. There's a society around you, whether you like it or not.

There's a legal and moral difference between bad content being put on chain in weird and clever ways versus bad content being officially allowed and relayed.

You may not see the difference but the rest of society will. And that will be bad for bitcoiners.

Core is the one that radically changed bitcoin with v30. There was no necessity and no emergency to change bitcoin radically. It was working fine.

Still working fine. All this shit is made up