its completely understandable you want to make the discussion about something else.
but your cope doesnt make the sender knowing the destination of their payment "tracing the payment"
its completely understandable you want to make the discussion about something else.
but your cope doesnt make the sender knowing the destination of their payment "tracing the payment"
It is tracing when you follow the money
It doesn't stop being tracing just cuz the first step is easy in monero
just like its "tracing" when you give me an address and I send you a letter.
it doesnt stop being tracing just because you gave me the address .
🤡
its kinda amazing that you're comfortable being this retarded on public
but hey "never admit fault or defeat" right? always double down, no matter how fucking ridiculous. the normies dont care about facts anyway and its not YOUR job to actually provide accurate information, right?

if I can send you a small payment on chain, connect it to a public key that I can then follow through other payments, how is that not tracing exactly? I really don't understand your argument
you cannot follow it through other payments.
therefore it isnt tracing.
his contention that simply knowing the first step, ie you send me a payment and therefore know where it goes,
that itself constitutes "tracing the payment"
I probably need to research more what super testnet is claiming, but one thing that's for certain is that his claims about lightning network are correct. tracing lightning payments, even given the lightning invoice is not really possible, in any way (especially when using bolt12)
Nobody is disputing his claims about LN, it isnt the subject of discussion.
He is simply asserting *the sender knowing the destination of their payment* is called "tracing the payment"
Yes, it really is that retarded. My apologies.