Not having monthly subscriptions wonβt stop any growth what so ever if bounties and grants are still a thing.. as well as individuals like yourself zapping devs whenever they drop an update thatβs valuable to them. Iβd say we need to make that more of the norm, not look to make users add on new subscriptions to the ones they already pay. I agree they arenβt slaves n neither should they be wage slaves with monthly income. Why not find a solution to pay off their entire year of work, so they can focus solely on this.. most are not focused entirely on nostr, most still have their own day jobs/businesses. this needs to be discussed n talked about more bc subscriptions just isnβt it.
i'm not a fan of subscriptions too, but it's gonna be difficult without them
Please Login to reply.
Idk man weβve came this far without them
Im normally not a fan of subscriptions but the way Stemstr and Zap.stream have theirs setup as more of a pay as you go model is pretty cool
pay per usage is fire if thatβs what it is
Stemstr has a 3 day subscription so your not tied to a full month!
maybe you/we could do a frog talk about this subject after riga, let's discuss it a bit, let's explore alternatives
Iβm super down!
let's plan it then π«πΈπ
Iβm free π«‘π«
Just change the name subscription to annualized dev support and make it lump sat deposits.
Unlock some features like relays have done π
Apple really screwed the Damus model of optional matching for support.