Not having monthly subscriptions won’t stop any growth what so ever if bounties and grants are still a thing.. as well as individuals like yourself zapping devs whenever they drop an update that’s valuable to them. I’d say we need to make that more of the norm, not look to make users add on new subscriptions to the ones they already pay. I agree they aren’t slaves n neither should they be wage slaves with monthly income. Why not find a solution to pay off their entire year of work, so they can focus solely on this.. most are not focused entirely on nostr, most still have their own day jobs/businesses. this needs to be discussed n talked about more bc subscriptions just isn’t it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

i'm not a fan of subscriptions too, but it's gonna be difficult without them

Idk man we’ve came this far without them

Im normally not a fan of subscriptions but the way Stemstr and Zap.stream have theirs setup as more of a pay as you go model is pretty cool

pay per usage is fire if that’s what it is

Stemstr has a 3 day subscription so your not tied to a full month!

maybe you/we could do a frog talk about this subject after riga, let's discuss it a bit, let's explore alternatives

I’m super down!

let's plan it then πŸ«‚πŸΈπŸ’œ

Just change the name subscription to annualized dev support and make it lump sat deposits.

Unlock some features like relays have done πŸ˜€

Apple really screwed the Damus model of optional matching for support.