Replying to Avatar Judge Hardcase

👆 this!

There is WAY more 'systemic' risk in having only a single point of influence capable of making unilateral changes. The more clients capable of making changes only with respect to their de minimis sphere of influence, the better.
Avatar
jb55 4mo ago 💬 1

Satoshi disagreed

nostr:nevent1qqswpze5hx2hy9vh4sz7drwgeyd5w0fu0dpn5jdws9nnw2pz2j4rcrgpzfmhxue69uhk5mt0daek2tnjda3kkucpvemhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33w94hg6nedvc8ver3d3n8xuehwaa8gcthv3hxkcf4wp58svnsxdmxcan3x5c8svr6xscry6ntxfnx56r5deckc7pew9shx0mzwfhkzerrv9ehg0t5wf6k2qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejqzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn9leme4p

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Judge Hardcase 4mo ago

Appeal to authority notwithstanding, the results are in: a second implementation that doesn't provide identical results is indeed a bad idea... for the second implementation (see Bitcoin Cash).