Nostr Web Client

Replying to

Kayne

Everyone using the same client is a huge risk to the network.

One bad update, a single mistake, and Bitcoin network could become compromised.

Why are you against diversity of clients?

It really does not make sense to be against decentralisation, like, that's the whole fucking point of Bitcoin.

No central bank. Decentralised.

Judge Hardcase 4mo ago 💬 1

👆 this!

There is WAY more 'systemic' risk in having only a single point of influence capable of making unilateral changes. The more clients capable of making changes only with respect to their de minimis sphere of influence, the better.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

jb55 4mo ago 💬 1

Satoshi disagreed

nostr:nevent1qqswpze5hx2hy9vh4sz7drwgeyd5w0fu0dpn5jdws9nnw2pz2j4rcrgpzfmhxue69uhk5mt0daek2tnjda3kkucpvemhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33w94hg6nedvc8ver3d3n8xuehwaa8gcthv3hxkcf4wp58svnsxdmxcan3x5c8svr6xscry6ntxfnx56r5deckc7pew9shx0mzwfhkzerrv9ehg0t5wf6k2qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejqzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn9leme4p

Judge Hardcase 4mo ago

Appeal to authority notwithstanding, the results are in: a second implementation that doesn't provide identical results is indeed a bad idea... for the second implementation (see Bitcoin Cash).