Replying to fe610cb7...

That's fun to think about, but I think it's more in line with the nostr way to build a system where the humans are the algorithm. The existing reaction kind should be enough as long as there is a standardized way to up and down vote, like '+' and '-'.

With that standard in place, my client can then show me the top voted suggested edit, with votes filtered through my web of trust.
Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 1y ago

Nice! Yep, or use the reactions to refine the answer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
rustyspark 1y ago

But I believe the power of community notes is that those who don’t normally agree, this time agree. That prevents the power of the mob from simple majority rule or “”democracy. Also, community notes members have a vetting/waiting period. To reduce and prevent bots. How will you implement that type of protection against bots? Would people need to have made a certain number of posts and likes and comments before they can use this particular up vote or down vote reaction?

Avatar
rustyspark 1y ago

Perhaps you could make a new specific comment event called “context” or “aside” which basically starts a a sub thread on a given event about the context of that comment, as opposed to continuing the in line conversation. This could be used as a community note, or any other type of context appropriately.

Avatar
Cyber Seagull 1y ago

Did you miss the "filtered by my web of trust" part ?

Avatar
rustyspark 1y ago

So your web of trust overlaps with people you generally disagree with? Or what do you mean by your web of trust?

Avatar
captain ☦️ 1y ago

We're not trying to re-create Twitter on nostr. Edits combined with WoT can be the tools for something totally new that doesn't exist in social media

Avatar
ManiMe 1y ago

Srsly. It’s like V having a convo with himself … just to prove a point. 😂

I love you vitor, but … there are bigger problems to solve.