After listening to nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev talk about #drivechains recently, I think I agree with his perspective.

The concept of miners voting for other coins is antithetical to the basis of Bitcoin's consensus mechanism. Human action means backing up your beliefs by taking making a clear decision. Voting is fine for unimportant things because it's a flawed a manipulatable system.

Committing to one path or another is how real value is determined. Anything less is sitting the fence. I don't have the technical background on this topic, but these decisions should be based on first principles.

What do y'all think? Is there something that I'm missing or am I completely off base in my logic?

#bitcoin #scaling #asknostr

Nope not at all.

#Bitcoin is beautiful because its keys or GFY.

Any "voting" is fucking the same as " staking " but the thing here is the ones that " staked" into the sidechain dont get to decide " what happened" outside of bitcoin the miners get to vote and theyll vote for whatever pays them the most regardless of what is " truth"

Id rather not introduce voting at all simply because if we introduce some human intervention mechanism into #bitcoin i can assure you it WILL be used as we dumb humans can not and will not refrain from using it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.