I second this, and quoting the note via Primal that will definitely show up as reply to nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s when I view it on Damus.
nostr:note1znsa6mags7uzk2srmeylrn022gjhkyerf2nvy2rtzkhy459d5nhsmtr8kn
Yup. 👍
vitor says no so I guess we can’t fix this. i forgot he runs the show over there now
I’ve documented this Damus implementation as DIP-02 since the nips repo is borderline useless these days
Is this sorta what @mikedilger was upset about? Inconsistency within the NIP implementation, among other things?
This proposed change breaks almost nothing and is relatively harmless, if its not merged its not the end of the world, i will just filter out mention markers like other clients and take the bandwidth hit.
This is terrible
He didn’t say no. I think you already have consensus. nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn reopened the PR.
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z C’mon dude, we gotta fix this thing. Do it for the plebs.
I tried. Now it's with everybody else.
🙄
