So, am I seeing this correctly that nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89u93ntq6 has only won a single block (as "OCEAN")?

Some principles are costly. (I'm leaning toward the "ordinals and inscriptions are a form of DDoS attack" side of the argument, but open to other thoughts.)

DDoS attacks don’t typically make the system that’s being attacked stronger so it seems like a lazy terminology. They are paying miners more for these ordinal to be minted than we are for transactions. Miners are incentivized to take the higher fee first. The people behind it will eventually lose interest in ordinals when the price of them collapses towards the underlying sat price and resell value falls.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Reasonable points. I'm not really firm on the whole thing, I don't know enough. Still listening. Thanks for the response.

No matter will revert to the mean faster than btc's fee market. Emphasis on no need to do anything here!

No market*