So, am I seeing this correctly that nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89u93ntq6 has only won a single block (as "OCEAN")?
Some principles are costly. (I'm leaning toward the "ordinals and inscriptions are a form of DDoS attack" side of the argument, but open to other thoughts.)
They've mined two blocks
They don’t kill on random and probabilities, but that’s not my problem, since two is about that, nit the go rage over thieving whores of Babylon.
So lets see how that holds. Friends don’t lie.
😉
In the weak and corrupt practices of social engineering.
They are drawing dead there, and their own demise.
But let’s see who’s to man the revolution as kinda difficult for themed thieving whores to mine anything anymore.
It’s their lives. #MRC
🕷️ 
They better be able to answer for the network rodentry hen states are the revolution.
So mine to be paying for with life.
🌹
It’s either that or inciting crime, from which both are drawing dead to the facts, besides the embarrassment to whoop a broken house.
Hook, line and as sinker, special case coming from cunts spent more time in court than the executive.
🕷️
Mined?
You can.
Because let’s not forget how a couple wars broke out since, besides then plague.
🌹
Down like a clown to argue mined two.
🕷️
#MRC 
Curious what people are going to do about random killing sprees?
It’s about to become common understanding and every cent to be followed by the people to ensure they are held accountable for their corrupt actions.
Fathom having something to do with that? Needing to answer to those people having lost their loved ones to massacres.
And believe you me, it won’t be no no actress douchery under oath for them to try by.
🕷️
So about that two mined. Guess this will be the end of that nonsense going.
Cardinal condemns 'cold–blooded' killing of two women in Gaza church https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/18/women-mother-daughter-gaza-church-israel-cardinal-vincent-nichols
DDoS attacks don’t typically make the system that’s being attacked stronger so it seems like a lazy terminology. They are paying miners more for these ordinal to be minted than we are for transactions. Miners are incentivized to take the higher fee first. The people behind it will eventually lose interest in ordinals when the price of them collapses towards the underlying sat price and resell value falls.
Satoshi solved the spam problem with proof of work. #Bitcoin cannot be DDOS'd
From the perspective of a regular, non-ordinal user, ordinal transactions are merely inefficient in terms of block space. That is, they transfer sats (as all transactions do), but use more block space than necessary to do it.
But while those transactions are inefficient in space terms, they must be efficient in fee terms. That is, they must outbid other transactions for miners to pick them up.
It MUST be the case that outbidding competitors is sufficient to get your valid transaction included. It is by this mechanism that censored parties can disincentivize would-be censors.
We are all counting on ordinals succeeding. If the network manages to censor ordinal transactions (while still admitting that those transactions are valid) then the network could just as well censor other valid transactions for other reasons—e.g. Big Brother forbids non-KYC coin, etc.
