Replying to Avatar Sirius

nostr:nevent1qgspwwwexlwgcrrnwz4zwkze8rq3ncjug8mvgsd96dxx6wzs8ccndmcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcqyqkexg22jpj9z49hg6xhayw3aw3mf67dp45drgt29f2tm58fvk46ysyzae5

I agree with this. It's better to use MLS if it works reliably and is not overly complicated to use as a library. Double ratchet's advantage is simplicity: it's fairly easy to implement on all platforms. I think it makes sense to try both and see how it goes. Maybe both have different use cases.

Avatar
elsat 10mo ago

Thank you Martti.

What do you envision as the use case(s) where these encryption methods two find product-market fir?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Sirius 10mo ago

For example, double ratchet is easy and lightweight to add to a chat widget on a web page. Less than 100KB bundle, including dependencies from nostr-tools. Actually, it could perhaps be included as a nip library in nostr-tools.