Bounty is the right way to do it. And the amount is generous.
He’s just crying, because he’d like to be paid for amount of work instead of results.
Marx is really hard to get out of people’s brains.
Bounty is the right way to do it. And the amount is generous.
He’s just crying, because he’d like to be paid for amount of work instead of results.
Marx is really hard to get out of people’s brains.
Agreed, it’s called “skin in the game”, few people have the entrepreneurial spirit.
It’s not just lack of skin in the game or entrepreneurial thinking.
It’s plain Marxist indoctrination.
Any farmer knows that it doesn’t matter how hard or much you work, results are the only thing that is valuable and thus monetizable.
We are all too accustomed to the scam of wage labor.
Are you aware of any complex system that was successfully built on a bounty model?
Microsoft, Apple, Tesla… every company is a bounty model. Only that your customers normally don’t tell you exactly what they want and how much they’ll pay.
Ok. I don’t have time to debate the definition of a bounty model. Good day.
No, you don’t have time to think about the fact that a bounty model is a nicer offer than pure entrepreneurship, while you’d like to have a fat paycheck guaranteed, because Marx theory of value is such a convenient excuse.
True, there's always a bounty out there for new products, to the extent they meet needs in the market. Do I understand you correctly that your analogy is most pure when employees get paid only profitshare and/or coequity owners?