Oh damn. Yeah that’s a rabbit hole I have certainly never gone down. Never even heard of it, but might be fun to explore it. I find that one hard to accept though because the propaganda it would take to convince the Japanese that there was a bomb that destroyed entire cities that didn’t actually happen or with fake images of the aftermath would be a very complex undertaking with many many “leaks” in the narrative, imo.

I could certainly believe that the magnitude and power of the ones that are supposedly “a thousand times bigger than Nagasaki!!!” Is overblown bullshit and we don’t actually have bombs big enough to wipe out the bottom third of the eastern United States. But that they don’t exist at all is a road I have never ventured down 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't think there's any question about the US bombing Japan or the devastating civilian toll 😢. My understanding of the claim is that those weren't nuclear bombs and that there's something questionable about the state of that particular technology.

But I should probably stop here because I genuinely don't know anything about it! Just happened to have come across that same claim in the last week.

I highly recommend that book I linked if you were interested, here's the authors bio.

"Akio Nakatani is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. His research interests include Stochastic Systems, Parameter Estimation, Stochastic Optimization, Monte Carlo Methods and Simulation, Neural Networks, Statistical Pattern Recognition, Statistical Image Analysis, Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models, Time Series, Graphical Models, Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models."

I have become very skeptical of nukes at this point, but it's a lot to reconcile, the idea that superpowers would be colluding and lying on levels not before considered.

Huh, haven't seen that before. For some reason it reminds me of Robert Wilmer injecting himself with 'aids' blood.

Perhaps the same type of scam, all along.