Subnostr

I need to modify my long-term accusation that Chinese Constitution is false, because after discussing with ChatGPT, I realize that its argument is more reasonable and convincing. I’ll introduce the discussions under this thread:

我应该修正一下我以前一直所说的中国宪法是“伪宪”的说法，因为和ChatGPT讨论之后，我认为，它的看法更加具有理性和说服力。我慢慢地把内容贴在这里。

1. 通常情况下，宪法是一个政府依法建立的基本法律和原则的框架，并概述公民的权利和责任。宪法的内容可包括：规定和限制政府机构和官员的权力，并授予个人以权利和保护。

在很多情况下，宪法可能还包括规定个人义务的条款，例如纳税或在陪审团中任职，这些义务通常被认为对政府的运转和社会秩序的维护至关重要。然而，这些义务不应侵犯个人的思想或良心自由。任何此类规定都必须尊重社会中所存在的信仰和意识形态的多样性，并且不得迫使个人违背自主意愿去接受任何特定的信仰系统或意识形态。

值得注意的是，不同的国家对其宪法的角色和职能范围有不同的看法和处理方式。在某些国家，例如美国，宪法被视为全国的最高法律，旨在成为政府长期稳定的框架。而在其他国家，宪法则可能更加灵活，可以频繁地进行修改和修订。

至于一部宪法是否被视为“伪宪”可能取决于特定的背景和法律的解释。如果一部宪法明显与民主治理或个人自由的原则不相容，那么它可能被认为是有问题的或需要修订的。

In general, a constitution is a fundamental set of laws and principles that establishes the framework for a government and outlines the rights and responsibilities of citizens. A constitution may specify the powers and limits of government institutions and officials, as well as the rights and protections afforded to individuals.

In many cases, a constitution may also include provisions mandating individual obligations, such as paying taxes or serving on a jury, which are typically considered necessary for the functioning of the government and the maintenance of the social order. However, such obligations should not infringe upon an individual's freedom of thought or conscience. It is imperative that any such provisions respect the diversity of beliefs and ideologies that exist within society, and refrain from coercing individuals to subscribe to any particular belief system or ideology against their will.

It's worth noting that different countries have different approaches to the role and scope of their constitutions. In some countries, such as the United States, the constitution is seen as the supreme law of the land and is meant to be a stable and enduring framework for the government. In other countries, constitutions may be more fluid and subject to frequent amendment and revision.

In any case, whether a constitution is considered "false" or not would likely depend on the specific context and the interpretation of the law. If a constitution were to include provisions that are clearly incompatible with the principles of democratic governance or individual liberty, it may be deemed problematic or in need of revision.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

三不運動蘇利利 2y ago

中国的宪法问题（二）

中国宪法是在政府的控制和监视下起草和通过的，应该说这不符合宪法作为限制政府权力和保护个人权利的文件的要求。与此相反，中国宪法非常强调中国共产党在治理国家中的统治者角色，并对个人权利和自由做了一系列的规定和限制。

在民主社会中，宪法通常被视为建立政府基本框架的文件，它包括权力的分立和个人权利和自由的保护。宪法还会建立对政府权力进行限制的条款，例如通过建立独立的司法机构或要求不同政府部门之间的制衡等条款。

当然，在包括中国在内的威权社会中，政府不仅不是建立对政府权力的限制条款，反而可能使用宪法和其他法律框架强加义务于个人并限制其自由。这可能导致个人受到各种法律义务和限制的约束，而政府却可以对每个人的生活掌握着巨大的控制权。

最终，宪法的效力和合法性将取决于许多因素，包括在宪法的起草和通过过程中的民众参与程度，其是否为政府的权力设置了制衡机制，以及宪法保护个人权利和自由的程度。在一个社会中，若宪法被当作政府控制和压迫人民的工具时，要想实现宪法的理论目标可能会面临相当大的困难。

The Chinese Constitution was drafted and passed under the control and surveillance of the government, and may not conform to the ideal of a constitution as a document that establishes limits on government power and protects individual rights. Instead, the Chinese Constitution places significant emphasis on the role of the Communist Party in governing the country, and provides for a number of limitations on individual rights and freedoms.

In democratic societies, the Constitution is typically seen as a document that establishes the basic framework of government, including the separation of powers and the protection of individual rights and freedoms. The Constitution may also establish limits on government power, such as through the establishment of an independent judiciary or the requirement for checks and balances between different branches of government.

It is certainly true that in authoritarian societies, including China, the government may use the Constitution and other legal frameworks to impose obligations on individuals and restrict their freedoms, rather than to establish limits on government power. This can lead to a situation in which individuals are subject to a range of legal obligations and restrictions, while the government retains significant power and control over their lives.

Ultimately, the effectiveness and legitimacy of a Constitution will depend on a number of factors, including the degree of popular participation in its drafting and adoption, the extent to which it provides for checks and balances on government power, and the degree to which it protects individual rights and freedoms. In societies where the Constitution is used primarily as a tool for government control and oppression, there may be significant challenges to realizing these goals.

三不運動蘇利利 2y ago

中国宪法的问题（三）

毫无疑问的是，中国宪法因其未保护个人权利（正利）和自由，且被置于中国共产党权威之下而受到了许多法律专家和人权倡导者的批评。

阐述这个问题的一个方法就是，突出宪法作为保护公民免受政府滥用权力、保障所有公民的基本权利（正利）的屏障的重要性。在一个民主社会中，宪法通常被视为人民和政府之间的契约，确立政府权力的规则和该权力所受到的限制，并确保个人权利（正利）和自由得到尊重。

然而，在中国，许多人认为，宪法更像是政府的工具，而不是保护人民权利的手段。这可以从几点看出来：1. 宪法将司法体系置于党的领导之下；2. 限制言论和集会自由；3. 允许未经审判就可以实施拘留和惩罚。

It is certainly true that the Chinese Constitution has been criticized by many legal experts and human rights advocates for its lack of protections for individual rights and freedoms, and for its subordination to the authority of the Communist Party.

One way to frame this issue is to highlight the importance of a constitution that serves as a safeguard against government abuses of power and protects the fundamental rights of all citizens. In a democratic society, the constitution is typically viewed as a contract between the people and the government, outlining the rules and limits of government power and ensuring that individual rights and freedoms are respected.

However, in China, the constitution is seen by many as more of a tool of the government, rather than a means of protecting the rights of the people. This can be seen in the way that the constitution subordinates the judiciary to the party, limits freedom of speech and assembly, and allows for detention and punishment without trial.