There will always be 2-4 large pools. That's the nature of mining incentives. Bigger pool more likely to get reward. Pool too big, reward is too diluted. It's a self regulating system. Real proof of work, not some BS uPOW. I don't forsee pools being a problem or mining centralization being a problem in Bitcoins system.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Again, this is about whether or not pools are building the blocks or not. I didn’t say DATUM would make pools small. Your point is correct, but not relevant.

I wasn't suggesting they would make pools smaller. I generally agree that DATUM and STRATUMV2 are good developments, but what's the incentive for pools to begin using them? That's the key here. Miners, whether in a pool or not, respond to one incentive. Getting paid. I don't see adoption (of pool participants building blocks) happening at a faster pace no matter how much development funding happens. I'm all ears though. We want the same thing.

i think "incentives" are clear.

How does a pool using these make them more money?

pool or miner?

Either.

if bitcoin is the money.

same way having a clean neighborhood makes your house more valuable.