Subnostr

If relay owners can censor, then technically, you could create, as fiatjaf had suggested, a "no-fly list" where most relays ban a particular person

🤔

Of course, not all relays will comply but most will

#grownostr #plebchain

nostr:nevent1qqsvthjk0xhrc6jdkja47l5zwzxgzn4snrweszmm55a0lh79d6yttkcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qygxfm5h4ftf8uxt4gdke0zg304mq6ak5tjfr7zgzkp2r9f05gz49mvpsgqqqqqqs3cgv0k

Sacred Peak 1y ago

I'm not sure that "most will" is accurate. I think that "some will, some won't" is probably closer to the truth.

(my take)

in the end, the idea that everyone is going to want to hear everyone else's words, etc. is nothing more than a pie in the sky idea. free speech is free speech and at the same time, I don't have to agree, believe or listen if I don't want to. freedom is free, completely.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

retired npub 1y ago

I suppose my point was that if someone is peddling child porn, censorship shoulybe at the relay level

With hate speech and racism, I think you can leave it to the individual

So, as you've said, it's a matter of degrees of freedom

Sacred Peak 1y ago

child porn yuck.

but even 'normal' porn, I think what is required is not censorship. what we need is law to force all porn to a top level domain of .porn and for children's devices to not be able to access that top level domain.