Yo.
Get reading.
Discussion
What is this?
There is SO much overlap between the U.K. and the U.S.A. when I hear Brits discuss it. I'm wowwed by just how American the Brits' grievances sound. Proof of international bankers and other globalists ensuring the transition of enslavement from the old days of literal chains to modern times of statutes and peonage.
Spoiler alert.
There was no revolution.
Describes the whole strawman game. It's a large monopoly game and your ID is the figure with who you play. You never can be your ID Card.
so, we are in a simulation?
I am Matthew Kuraja.
I am not MATTHEW KURAJA.
I wrote the IRS an affidavit making this distinction clear, because they insist they only write their letters to MATTHEW KURAJA. Never to Matthew Kuraja, despite my insistence they address me by my name as I assert it to be.
I told them I now (finally) understand that I, the natural man, never consensually contracted with them a taxation owed. But the legal fiction (they created) does owe them (because maxim of law - that which one creates , one controls). I am not the Trustee of that all-caps entity. If anything, I am only the Beneficiary.
The IRS acknowledged my letter, telling me they'll respond to my formal taxpayer dispute within 60 days if they dispute anything at all.
In law, to not dispute an assertion within the agreed time window is known as establishimg tacit agreement. Meaning, all parties agree there is no dispute, even if consensus was not explicitly given.
Think about how court is conducted. If one party says something wrong, the other party must immediately speak out "Objection!". To not do so is to implicitly agree. There can be no objection then at a later time.
That 60 day window expired nearly a year ago. The IRS will not volunteer a receipt of proof I am free because they don't want that to trend in social media, but my account is now discreetly tagged in their database as a lawful non-taxpayer.
In an old, landmark court ruling the govt never teaches us happened, the judge said " if you do not know and assert your rights, then they cease to exist".
Those of us that do demonstrate we understand are allowed to live free. But so many fools that must still be managed as wards of the State cannot be made aware of this revelation. Else, with ignorance, they'll protest to be treated the same. That's why courts quietly dismiss trials with sovereigns than let trial complete to their outcome "for the record". There can be no official record of such liberating trials for plausible deniability when reckoning with the knuckle-dragging ignorant protestors.
YT Audio Book - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY1xngVN2hs