Straight forward feedback on why the application was denied is beneficial to all participants and reduces the drama fuel. Why not?
Discussion
Whos going to write the feedback?
Whoever is keeping meeting minutes during the vote, perhaps? I'm assuming there's some discussion of the acceptance criteria and then a vote.
and simply share the notes and remove the names for privacy if that is the issue.
Or have AI write a summary for each application discussed.
Someone should start an org with all those ideas. There is need for even more options.
You asked a question. I gave you a reasonable answer.
It is fair to assume that the selection and evaluation is being recorded, in some way, as that is standard practice for meetings.
Simply structure the process, from the beginning, so that it is transparent, in the end. That will lower the amount of effort required, in the mid-term, not raise it.
How is feedback not a requirement, but instead a cop-out: "it's simply too resource intensive"