Well. Which narrative do you prefer?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

lol

no serious financial person considers an asset a SoV on a 15 year history.

its because we believe in the fundamentals, not the track record.

i liked p2p electronic currency

i also liked separating money and the state

store of value is a pretty weak and boring narrative.

Isn't it great for all of the above?

definitely not.

No? I guess you are still looking for Fiat gains. Zoom out.

how does that even relate to what i said

Its completely unrelated I suppose.

It's not why I'm here. The world needs foss money without ttps. Current propoganda is an attempt at containing revolution. They will lose.

i do not understand how a revolution will take place with a public, transparent ledger which is mostly used through custodians.

Not the way I use it. Bitcoin is used a lot of ways.

Hard work, blood, sweat and tears. Building such things takes time.

But here's a tutorial I made for non-custodial payment server. This is x100 times easier than it was a few years ago, and will be x100 times easier in a few years more. Let us proceed together apace etc etc

https://youtu.be/ljqXSxXnYxc

this is great 🙂

thank you, watched it, appreciate your work.

i waited soo many years already, still i find self custodial lightning, channel management and having to rent liquidity a terrible user experience.