Would be nice if you provided details regarding the last paragraph

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Second post in an hour where he's just teasing us. Come on nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

MAJOR ETF WAS GOING TO SUPPORT OPEN SOURCE DEVS.

COMPETITION WAS TIGHT PRE LAUNCH.

THEY DID NOT WANT TO ANGER SAYLOR SO THEY PULLED OUT.

LEARN HOW TO READ.

Name your sources. Which ETF should we hate now and why exactly? This is the claim you made in the other post nobody got an answer when asking for details.

But yeah, your teasing keeps being good as long as nobody spills the beans.

so some of saylor’s bitcoin is ETF bitcoin?

So like Blackrock was afraid of little Saylor? šŸ˜‚ More and clear explanation is needed, this is not a telenovela come on spill the beans already!

Any insight on this? @npub1jpvsahpy0vgq7gu8nfqjkeskce0gwjk8jpss590xkvjh5xxe4epsruqgsz

Why would Saylor see that as a threat?

That doesn’t sound right. Only competition that matters is for clients and what’s your marketing proposition?

ā€œwE DoN’t SupPort OpeNSouuRceā€?

lol

You even have Cathie ā€œI’ll-get-your-401kā€ Woods sponsoring Bitcoin developers, whoever they are are new to the game and/or very small.

It doesn’t make any sense. Matt’s reaction, however, is starting to make a lot of sense.

CATHIE WOOD LOOKS LIKE A BLOOD SUCKER AND SO DOES SAYLOR. VAMPIRES NOT TO BE TRUSTED

Didn't want to anger Saylor? Why the fuck would they care what Saylor thinks/feels? He's not that important.

Nostr is no place for all caps bro