I talked to peter in amsterdam about this. He thinks nostr would be better on a blockchain. Was surprised to hear him say that considering how bad of an idea it is.
Thoughts?
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft@`miljan` nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 nostr:npub1j8y6tcdfw3q3f3h794s6un0gyc5742s0k5h5s2yqj0r70cpklqeqjavrvg nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240
Discussion
Peter might be smart, but he’s full of stupid takes
it needs a consensus algorithm but it doesn't have to be very strongly consistent, it needs to be available and singular (partition resistant). merkle dags of some flavour would go a long way towards this.
but who tf is peter todd anyway? why would i listen to him when he probably barely even understands the first principles of distributed systems?
