Understood, let me word it differently. When Govts are against Bitcoin they said it is used mainly for criminals to do illegal things.
We know that isn't true.
So when we have a Core vs Knots debate should we use the same arguments Govts do ( in this case OP used Pedophilia).
Plenty of other, more valid, examples for Core vs Knots, no need to use Govt scare tactics and broad generalizations about how Core users are helping criminals.
Totally got that. My point remains.
There is no debate in the matter to me at all. There is not a complex balance to be found between free speech and a functioning Bitcoin network.
Users are not losing any personal freedom or rights by keeping the Bitcoin network an exclusively monetary network.
With govt policies, there is a threat of losing personal freedoms when controls are put in place for “safety”. The safety vs freedom balance is a real issue with centralized governance over the lives of citizens.
This logic does not apply to a decentralized monetary network. Our freedom and lives are not controlled by the Bitcoin network. It is simply just a P2P monetary exchange network and should remain simply that.
You totally misunderstood, read carefully
