This's a common theme on the internet.
Person A says rpi is bad for purpose X.
I ask why.
People start commenting that there's better compute for similar price.
Except it's not answer to what I asked. My question isn't trying to discover best compute for pi price, it's trying to discover what's bad about pi for purpose X.
"Why pi is bad for purpose x?" and "Can I get better compute for purpose X w/ similar price point?" are different questions.
I gave you a straight answer: storage is suboptimal and fragile, not my fault if you don't believe me.
If you want more reasons:
* aarch64 is a shitty architecture: bootloaders are different for each hardware and are super proprietary, hard to configure and just terrible in general compared to standard x86 bootloaders.
* there's less software support overall for aarch64
* rpis heavily depend on proprietary firmware for most basic functionality, almost nothing is upstreamed to the linux kernel
"storage is suboptimal and fragile, not my fault if you don't believe me."
I accept defeat, I'll assume you think rpi puts a Demonic curse on the same SSD that's used everywhere when you connect it to rpi, given no other form of explanation is provided despite asking multiple times/ways.
