I think you'll find burning / seizing old coins to be a Rubicon most bitcoiners are unwilling to cross.
Discussion
In terms of number of humans, maybe.
In terms of economic majority of holding entities, I point you to Saylor as a prime example of how I expect whales to act.
I'm on team human.
That's fine, but Bitcoin is not a democracy in which human votes are counted.
oh OK, who's running all the nodes? ETF's? BTC Treasury companies?
Whoever wants to.
people already think youre a sell out. stop trying to prove them right. bitcoin is for all people. not just billionaires.
A natural consequence of building a huge audience is that some of them will hate you as a result of your words or actions. Some people hating me doesn't bother me in the slightest.
Bitcoin is for anyone, though it's clearly not for everyone, nor does it operate via any known governance model. If you're bothered by the power distribution of entities in Bitcoin, you're always free to leave.
you'll fork off before I "leave"
"let's do a hardfork cause Saylor wants to"
"you're free to leave"
dude we won't have to leave. all the suitcoiners will leave and we plebs can just run core v29 forever lol
None of these are hard forks.
Yes, you're free to continue running whatever node software you wish.
how tf will you confiscate coins without a hard fork
Disallowing spending from specific script types is a restriction of the existing rule set, which is a soft fork. Read my BIP for details.
https://github.com/jlopp/bips/blob/quantum_migration/bip-post-quantum-migration.mediawiki
so when you said people would buy my bitcoin if I didn't send it to a new quantum resistant address, that was just a figure of speech? cause the coins would be burned forever right?
No, I thought it was blindingly obvious that if you intend to sell your coins in order to protest a mandatory migration, you'd need to send them to an exchange BEFORE the migration deadline.
who's selling? we can keep using our coins after you split off, they just wont be compatible.
Made some fan art for BIP 6102
https://video.nostr.build/55b2124e21fc07d82941e56dd3d2fffc89310eb6045e2bde4622c7c7e70808b5.mp4
nostr:npub1enuxqa5g0cggf849yqzd53nu0x28w69sk6xzpx2q4ej75r8tuz2sh9l3eu
God has no sons
🌍 The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as:
📖 { “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”} (Quran 112:1-4) 📚
“Let’s say we are bad actors, what are you going to do to stop us?”
Says the Eth Laser Eye shitcoiner.
Go run Citrea on ETH, or ₿ Cash.
Shill’s gonna shill.
Slopp would make Core a private business if he could.
We need some better implementations.
This ain’t gonna cut it.
Actually they have been arguing to make core into a private company
I look forward to seeing your "better implementations."
I suggest you get to work building them instead of crying on social media.
you've already lost 1/4 of the market share to dasjr and that guy's fuckin nuts
Brainwashed puritan pleb market share, sure.
In terms of actual economic market share, notsomuch.
😂
Just tell them to stay humble and stack sats to diffuse them.
Hell yeah bro 😎
Stay humble and Stack Sats
The evil shitcoiner and manipulator Slopp strucks again.
Plebs who consider Bitcoin Freedom Money and not a spam dump are brainwashed?
Thats not true of course, they are not brainwashed.
As for economic market share, Saylor is not in favor of spam and jpegs on Bitcoin.
Your nfts will be worthless.
Nobody wants your garbage on the chain, you're worse than core.
Your node client is a direct attack on Bitcoin.
Fortunately it makes up less than 1% of the network.
Good luck with BIP 6102
My life’s good.
No tears here.
Turning Bitcoin into a wef cbdc just to protect your dickbutt nfts?
Bitcoin is a democracy.
Nodes are votes.
You're just a shitcoiner
I wonder why Bitcoin has so little uptake.
Saylor is no economic entity, he produces nothing and renders no services. My barber around the corner has more economic activity than Saylor.
So what I am hearing is. Wall Street determines the will of the Bitcoin network? I thought become meant freedom and free from coercion.
Wall Street will effectively control Bitcoin if everybody gives their bitcoin to wall street.
It remains to be seen if that becomes the case. I'd say it's not looking great.