πΆπΎπ π«π€£π€£π€£
lnbc69690n1pjc0zlrpp5jms2ypft45wec43u68lyxsx7yhljw8u8gxeagrfmxkpumchx3x4qdq22fqul86tfusp5f09n5earrpm8rfjrgg25qw9s50ksh5qw28u7822xvvlhqzrzhsgqmqz9gxqrrsscqp79q2sqqqqqysgqpjh72mmhc4ulys2r4dyu6hp03ry9qjle4jcdkyqhfc8mhtl0emv30ku0uppeqd60j5xkg2ysq8nct96j7r9xrcnp9lg5gn32q7yqlvsp55355t 
nostr:note1cmqwmt6xfl4pwvn8d89nksav9tla9mjntz4a9hhx5zkmt53t8mfstvh6cj
nostr:npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5 will pay all of these. He loves it when people post invoices!
lol! I sure hope not. Thatβs a lot of corn to give away πΆπΎπ«π€£π
Indeed ππ
π€£ Thanks π I may remake it with a little better resolution.
I deliberately made it PFP size. There are no clients that need more than this πΆπΎππππ
Itβs 2023 man. Nobody wants a little pixelated pfp ππ
It is now t, your phone literally downloads and discards all your pixels and only costs people in mobile charges and doesnβt add to the visuals at all. Why people donβt understand this πΆπΎπππ
No, a pixelated pfp looks awful when you enlarge it. You never tap on peopleβs pics to enlarge them?
Here is the full size, do as you will πΆπΎπππππππππ 
ππ€£ As a dev is the issue for you resolution (pixels) or file size?
Both. Itβs a waste of the money that people pay for their time and bandwidth πΆπΎπ
Hmm, well still I donβt want a pixelated profile pic. Seems like clients should do a better job handling this and thatβs no my problem. Display a lower quality version by default and only load a higher quality version if you tap on it to view it larger. Expecting people to be okay with low quality photos seems silly.
Itβs not. Itβs in your mind. As I said, 400px gives you about an inch on a high res display (phone). Most people probably use 100-200px per inch on a monitor. You can check by right click on pfp in chrome and inspect. If you see pixelated images, itβs because someone didnβt do a good job sharpening for a screen. Client cannot βaskβ for lower res, unless they have agreed upon protocol. If you want decentralized hosting, it means itβll not happen. 400px is the best compromise for 1% viewing at oversized resolution, where it will be downsized to 200px for enlarged view for 2-3% of viewing and down to 50px for 96% or more. So people using oversized PFPs are not doing anyone any good. Nobody complaining about twitter PFPs that are even smaller πΆπΎπ«‘
Is this censorship? I look at nostr:npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5 's PFP and can't see a single kernel. Just a yellow blob.
Think like a user, not a dev ππ«
I do, thatβs why I say no more than 400x400 (and thatβs already overkill) best retina is one inch for this many pixels πΆπΎπππ
π€£π€£π€£
Remember the absolute magic when joining Nostr and discovering that not only would an entire bolt 11 invoice fit in a single post (unlike twitter), but clients actually rendered them with a nice interface for paying them? π€―π
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1237x926&blurhash=%23CF5%7Ex9E00-UwatlV%40IotRebNG9%5D%24*%24%7Ex%5DZ%7ENH%25M%5E%2C%25M9FRPxvkWsla%7BIoD*f5%3FvIUV%40WVM%7BWAWB00t8_NNG%24kWBXSaKaxn2o%23%25gx%5DDjMxS%24Ris.DiM%7B-%3B%25gM%7BMxkXs.o1&x=2e76d6ef10babb5bbe9fd2fdaebc5262e70b7c936324eb4aef7e811e96048a2d
π₯³π π»πππ«π»
lnbc77770n1pjc0yc2pp5xqs4a2ens3sdpvcfpwct9vkx8enz9uw3rdh4ytvldnaxne9jn3lqhp5v2x6nfv25r7mn374qxt9kxlakyeuctk7sr6044lr3fle3mlzf2sqcqzzsxqyz5vqsp524ww8ad7nsayhpa4r43rjq0f9dtrxm0d3099z5qg9qy2upduqhns9qyyssqnwsc769mg0k5d8wwunrx924vj0d6pfdfc9vpnmkln2ysvgy8jnrx6jpd0yxqrmpk6uepzva3kxt6ckp02a8zlmxlqumf4z3r0q5cm6gqnkj2l5
lnbc77770n1pjc0yctpp5tlltz6a5muzvw4nruuvdcs26pmsr9uwxmv0g87p66yrha48qgt3qhp50tjasjg6c52hhmfxgjh8zykrj4gw37dr4u7nfc9x9czuvecvl6sqcqzzsxqyz5vqsp55msasrgqt25vswscdv5ue4xjymzxg9jts95qq59s3p97vxt53k2q9qyyssq8lyte08mq6aee67dyhd2vfe3kz6lxxaupazahhxy8dhyfqz3yef9499z6wz8wxcvwte3prm0ja8easwyrqf7l7qr2hwam3jutzq7zyqq4ln8t3
