I do not know the ancient history of Russia and Ukraine to give an opinion on the matter. I'm talking about coherence on the matter in general conflic situation and NATO/CIA after the WWII.
I have no opinion on historical territorial claims beyond those of my own country. Victim of dictatorships sponsored by the CIA in the 70s.
I translate: “I don’t know anything about neither rusia or Ukraine but I don’t like US/CIA/NATO and I know they all don’t like rusia so I stand with rusia”
Thats actually a pretty valid and okish position. But only like 100 years in the past and before. With the amount of available information a person making such claims looks plain stupid, because it could take at max couple of says to educate themselves. But they don’t want to spend their time and they better chose to become genocide supporters instead of admitting they are blessed to just don’t give a fuck yet and stay ignorant
You know, talking general we can't find truth. way better in my opinion is to analyze facts, verify it with different sources then make conclusion.
Just opinions friend, the only truth comes with time and history.
BTW what I said is not about history, it was about general logic. How territory can have or not have historical connection with country if he one minute ago said that country never existed.
I think we are trying to look for tiny details in a very deep discussion. It's beyond me too, it's just my opinions that They accompany my notes because that's how I feel and see it. Nothing serious.
